Gareth Owen wrote: Gareth, although I'm certainly of the 'hardliner' faction here, I agree with you. I think this is a case of an image that is perfectly o.k. for us to use. This is one of a handful of images that are of unique historical importance. This is an image that defines for most people what is important about the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. The lone unarmed individual standing with courage against the overwhelming power of a totalitarian state is what that event means to most people. I think that in this case, there is no plausible alternative to fair use (although a really good illustration is possible, I think that the actual photo is what has impact), but also the factors governing fair use all go in the right direction here. In other cases, though, and [[Drew Barrymore]] is my favorite for today, there is no free alternative only in the sense that there's no immediately convenient free alternative. --Jimbo