On 12 February 2012 17:34, Harry Burt <harryaburt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I do wonder if there's a conflation here of
publication and licensing.
For example, it is not clear to me whether publishing personal information
under a restrictive licence is less bad than publishing it under an open
one.
That is to say, I'm not sure that restrictive copyright is the right tool to
use in each of the examples. Wouldn't it be better simply to not disclose
the private information in the first place?
I've raised similar points on the talk page. Would you mind adding
your comments there? I think that's probably the better venue for this
discussion.