With all respect, this is a bit of a strange comment.
At the moment, there's a handful of pro-Israeli editors, a couple of
whom are bad apples, but there's also been an influx of
pro-Palestinian edit warriors who are just as bad, if not worse, than
any of the Israelis.
Our ongoing Israeli-Palestinian article mess is a complex one, but
it's simply not true to state that the Palestinian case is
marginalised here. There's plenty of good editors, such as node_ue,
who are strongly pro-Palestinian, and there's also more recently
numerous bad apples to back them up. Furthermore, I think there's a
fair case that it's the pro-Israeli one that's getting marginalised,
because at present, it seems like Jayjg is holding out alone (perhaps
with the support of L6W, until his ban goes through, anyway).
-- ambi
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:20:08 -0600, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
The question is, how, with almost no Palestinian
editors,
except for a few radicallized stand-ins, could any other viewpoint be
expressed without a special effort by advocates for Israel to ensure the
Palestinian perspective is expressed fairly.