On 6/29/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If we don't screen posts before they go to the
list, that would
explain why we've getting an incredible amount of trollish edits by
the likes of Rgulerdem over the past month or so. However it doesn't
explain why we *don't* get loads of off-topic borderline spam.
Posts from people who are not subscribed do not, by default, make it
through to the list. That knocks out all spam instantly. Occasionally
some legitimate posts are made in this fashion, and if we're on our
toes, we notice them and let them through, but probably a goodly
number get wiped. The list gets a hundred or more spam messages a
day...
Also, all subscribed users start out moderated, but are usually taken
off after their first message.
Clearly there is some moderation, and the moderators
are awake. But
their standards over the past month or so have been, to say the least,
somewhat catholic. To the extent that I wonder why we bother running
this list any more. The good discussion is being relentlessly drowned
out by idiocy.
I don't presume to set the standards for discussion, I only enforce
them. IMHO, it is up to people on this list to decide the standards
and tell others when it's time to drop a subject, or to ask people to
stop responding to trolls. Also, we do tend to react when we get
complaints to wikien-l-owner(a)wikipedia.org .
If people want, we could raise the minimum standards, and be more
proactive about moderating trolls. However, with the new directive
that grievances about blocks should not be brought here, that may not
be necessary.
Steve