An editor has recently been uploading a number of images to Wikipedia, and including the {{fairuse}} template at the top of each of them. Essentially he is asserting that he can upload any image he wants to Wikipedia, and then use it to illustrate any article in which it is relevant, under the "fair use" clause of United States copyright law. Is that correct? Jay.

Hi! On Mon, 23 May 2005 23:05:24 +0100, Violet/Riga wrote: I just can't believe that this has spurred another vote - I mean, the whole first proposal was a joke, trying to replace something that is arguably POV by something that is an even worse POV. And now everybody who doesn't want to suddenly face an absurd rule has to go through the whole BS *again*? Oh please, don't do this to us! Alex -- If you don't go over the top, you can't see what's on the other side. --- Jim Steinman --- Alex' Assorted Homepages: www.alexsite.de