daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
This morning, I removed two images from [[Childlove]]
Thanks for announcing it, so someone can revert it ;-)
Frankly, I am quite disgusted by this abuse of our
NPOV policy.
So now wanting to represent a POV is abuse of the NPOV policy? That's
interesting.
I haven't participated in this discussion so far because this is a very
sensitive subject, and because I didn't know much about it until
recently. This discussion got me interested, and I read some of the
stuff that was linked to in order to inform myself of the pedophiles'
point of view. It is a very radical point of view, and one that is quite
contrary to that of society at large, but that only makes it all the
more important for us to include it. Someone mentioned early in this
discussion that it would be dangerous for us to make the impression that
we are somehow endorsing pedophilia, but at the same time, censoring
this POV would be endorsing society's aversion, which (apparently)
pedophiles perceive as discrimination and prejudice.
I therefore strongly suggest we keep images that document this POV (as
long as they don't break any laws, of course).
Timwi