On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
I essentially agree, but it is less about non-homeopathists than about
anti-homeopathists. Some of us who may have nothing to do with the
practice are nevertheless respectfull of those who do. NPOV is
maintained by *fairly* representing the views of homeopathists, and
briefly recognizing the premises under which a large number of people
reject the practice. It does not require repetitive rejection of
detail. That just makes for tedious reading. It is not for us to judge
the validity of homeopathy, but to provide verifiability for both sides
of the conflict.
Excellently put, Ray. To put the last point another way, our aim is to
give a general outline of the current debate on a subject (if the
phrase "teach the conflict" hadn't been appropriated for other
purposes these days, it would be a good description).
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com