Yeah its incompatible, SA license requires
the is an exception that the copyright holder may waiver any condition of a SA license.

The site licensing clearly isnt the same, similar or compatible.  Interestingly if the images are individually licensed cc-by-3.0 then they are able to reuse without restriction or requesting a waiver.

The image in http://euobserver.com/7/28830 is a cc-by-3.0 license while the attribution isnt correct the resue is compatible
While the image in http://euobserver.com/7/28767 is a satalite photograph, which I have yet to locate on en:WP or Commons but the its either a PD license or its a government agency license either way attribution shouldnt be to WP

the other are proving a little difficult to track down for the purpose of giving example in this email that the image may be reusable under a different license than cc-by-sa

2009/10/23 Py mouss <pymouss44@gmail.com>
The license of the site (http://euobserver.com/static/terms) seems to be incompatible with the use of pictures licensed CC-BY-SA, no ?

2009/10/22 Lars Aronsson <lars@aronsson.se>

Nicolas Guérin wrote:

> Well, there's no really need to cite Wikipedia, because the license said
> that the author (the person who took the picture) and the license should be
> mentionned. To cite "Wikipedia" is welcome but not necessary.

Maybe we should just rename Wikimedia Commons to
you-are-free-to-reuse-it.org


--
 Lars Aronsson (lars@aronsson.se)
 Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se


_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l


_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l




--
GN.
http://gnangarra.redbubble.com/