I don't see any issue extracting the images from the books. However I
see a problem identifying an image when it is out of context.
And the text of the books is certainly as much of interest as the images.

Regards,

Yann

2014-08-31 1:01 GMT+05:30 David Goodman <dggenwp@gmail.com>:

> The reason to have the images specifically is that the key part of their
> project was the great difficulty in identifying and extracting the images
> from the books. . .
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Yann Forget <yannfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it would be better to have the whole books, rather than images
>> out of context.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Yann
>>
>> 2014-08-29 15:04 GMT+05:30 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
>> > Hoi,
>> > This article is of both interest to Commons and Wikipedia.. It is
>> > awesome.
>> > Thanks,
>> >     GerardM
>> >
>> > http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28976849
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Commons-l mailing list
>> > Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Commons-l mailing list
>> Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
>
>
>
> --
> David Goodman
>
> DGG at the enWP
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l