On 6/23/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for this explanation. I don't quite follow
the logical step
that was made between "one common and important use" and "the way this
should work", but, hey. In practice, in Wikipedia, this "common and
important" use is basically never used - we certainly don't want ASCII
art in our articles.
True, in general. The *idea* was to make things a bit less confusing,
which I think probably failed. YMMV.