On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:37:02PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 6/19/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
In that case, it sounds like the relevant
parameter should also be
stored on the image, rather than on the call to the image. It seems
unlikely to me that one would want to downscale using one method on
one page, and using a different method on another page. In extreme
cases (like, wanting to demonstrate pixelation), people can use the
current fallback method.
The amount of sharpening is size dependant..
Specifically, the amount of sharpening one might want is proportional
to both the original *and* the cropped size of the image.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra(a)baylink.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?