Steve Bennett wrote:
On 6/16/06, Erik Moeller <eloquence(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I think they're important lest we be confused
with a gardening store.
The allusion to the wiki syntax has always worked for me, and I've
seen quite a few wikis create derivative works with something else
between the brackets. (This is one reason why I insist that the logo
should be free content.)
Are they they only way this can be done? Is [[image]] the only
arrangement incorporating MediaWiki syntax with an image?
How about:
{{sofixit}}
No wait, that's the Wikipedia logo... ;)
I know I'm sounding negative here, but I'm not
particularly taken with
the new flower - always sort of liked the old one, asymmetry and all.
:) Would like to hear what others think.
The old flower has a real, organic look to it which I like, though it could do
with more contrast. The new one looks very fake, despite being real. :)
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)