Hi, I suppose this is a mail that Brian can answer (nooo ... don't kill
me ... I know you are overloaded with work).
On the Neapolitan wikipedia we have one particularity: it is a language
without stadardised writing (up to now) and it has local varieties that
sometimes vary really a lot. Besides that there are regions that are
attributed to the Neapolitan language group that really "far away" from
Neapolitan - this means that there are languages (that are not
considered as such) that are not understandable for us when we hear
those people talk.
Now as much as I understand the namespace manager could help us in that.
We could create namespaces for:
*standardised Neapolitan
*phonetic Neapolitan (at the moment, this would have the majority of
articles at the moment)
*language A (attributed to the NAP language group)
*language B (attributed to the NAP language group)
etc.
The mainpage would then become a page that leads to the several
namespaces where the NAMESPACE:Main_page would actually hold the main
page of that specific namespace and that could be different according to
contents etc.
So is the namespace manager made for such an approach? If yes, this
really helps us a lot since we do not need a single wikipedia for each
of these languages, we do not need to have more than one or two persons
to contribute to a language and this way these few people can start to
create contents and others will follow by time. It would not delude
people who join the projects just to be able to work in their language
and then see the possibility denied, since very often it is easier to
decide on a local level if something is to be considered "so different"
to be a separate language or just a local variety that should go into
the phonetic part (for example this would be the case for "Maiorese, the
Neapolitan spoken in Maiori - it is different from Neapolitan of Naples,
but it is easy to be understood by Neapolitans ... it is just a
different way to pronounce words, but not having a standardised way of
writing you can imagine that people from Maiori write a different
Neapolitan than people from Naples).
Another advantage of having groups of languages on one wiki is that
organising and administration becomes more effective and less time
consuming - this does not mean that we should merge big wikis (this
would be problematic- there are already too many edits to really be able
to really check everything) - but wikis of a certain "language group
region" or maybe languages with different writing standards (like nds
for example) there it would make sense.
Well I need to answer an e-mail of the Neapolitan discussion group and
therefore it would be helpful to know if this was possible or not.
Thanks!!!
Best, Sabine
___________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe esclusive
http://it.messenger.yahoo.com