Thanks to Brion for his statement at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AUM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Qif was up for shooting.
It is ugly.
WP:AUM has been used on :en as a motto to replace uses of Qif
with other ugliness.
Question: What shall we do now?
Qif is replaced now with a CSS trick (ugly):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adrian_Buehlmann/work/Conditional_express…
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush for an example use
(look at html source created by Infobox President template).
There is a third ugliness called weeble trick. Example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Adrian_Buehlmann/work/Infobox_TV_cha…
So which ugliness shall we use until we have conditional functions
in MediaWiki ("ifempty", "or", "not", "and". No
loops,
no gotos, no viruses)?
--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adrian_Buehlmann