Hi,
Someone suggested I (commons and en user:pfctdayelise) post this here.
If I am mistaken and Google does in fact index the Commons, I would
really appreciate someone explaining how to go about it. Comments
welcome on either of my user talk pages, COM:VP or by email.
cheers, Brianna (pfctdayelise)
Originally at [[commons:COM:VP#Keywords]]:
A related problem is that Google does not index the commons. Well,
more or less. It is basically impossible to find any commons content
in there - as you normally can by going ' keyword
site:commons.wikimedia.org '. Personally I find this rather
unbelievable and appalling on Google's behalf. Does anyone else think
we should, um, make them aware of this? pfctdayelise 13:26, 16 January
2006 (UTC)
This has been discussed before. Part of the problem is that
descriptive info is in "foo.jpg", but Google has no way of knowing
that we have text pages that just happen to be named identically to
the nontextual image files that everybody in the world uses. Another
problem is that Google ranks by references to the page, and most
commons pages look like orphans or near-orphans, image references from
WP articles being made "secretly" via the MediaWiki local/commons
two-step lookup. On keywords, feel free to add them anywhere, they
will help our own search algorithm. I'm not so inclined to be
concerned about that, considering how many thousands of images still
have not a single link or category. Stan Shebs 00:22, 17 January 2006
(UTC)
Google does have a way to know that those pages are HTML,
not binary files: it's in the http header field called "Content-Type".
Google just ignores it (or does not even try to load such a page).
[snip] Duesentrieb(?!) 02:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
--
"Mathematicians do it with Nobel's wife."