Quistnix wrote:
I think Servien is frustrated by the fact that
nds.wikipedia is
effectively taken over by German nationalists who have succeeded
in making people write a language spoken in parts of four countries,
using grammatic rules and conventions from only one. the fact that
the majority of the people writing in nds: lives in Germany was
abused to vote to make it a "democratic" decision.
Anton
Let me add a little secret. Most of our developers are very careful of
staying out of political issues.
Mentioning that the set up of a wiki *might* cause an uproar amongst
editors, whatever the reason (constructed language, nationalism,
dialect) will somehow launch a big warning flag... and is likely to slow
down even more the creation.
Wiki way :-)
Cheers up, developers are your friends
ant
Servien Ilaino wrote:
> Thanks for your comments... but I got the message, besides it wasn't
> "childish" in my opinion, it was meant to get a reaction for once,
> apparently this is what it takes :(. I took my chill pills, so we'll see
> when it all happens :)
>
> Serv
>
>
> 2006/1/8, Mark Williamson
> <node.ue(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
>> Servien,
>>
>> When new Wikipedias have been created in the past, it wasn't because
>> we called the developers names or resorted to other such childish
>> tactics.
>>
>> It is because we were patient, treated them with respect, asked kindly
>> and in a personal way, and didn't pout if they didn't give us what we
>> asked for _right away_.
>>
>> If I had acted like you are right now in advocating for their
>> creation, I'm betting we wouldn't have the Udmurt, Venet, Lombard,
>> etc. Wikipedias.
>>
>> So take my advice and take it down a notch. Take a chill pill. You're
>> not going to die if these Wikipedias aren't created immediately. You
>> have to be patient. The developers are your friends.
>>
>> They are on a busy schedule, and remember that it is a volunteer job
>> and they aren't paid except by donations (with one exception). The
>> developers have to worry about "real" jobs, school, family, and every
>> other concern of normal human beings because after all, they _are_
>> normal human beings (a developer can correct me if I'm wrong there).
>>
>> So give them a break. If you do, the Wikipedias will be created
>> eventually. If you don't, it will never be created.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 08/01/06, Servien Ilaino
>> <servien(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure they are usefull for developing software. But most people
>>
>>
>> who've
>>
>>> requested a wiki are kind of getting tired of waiting all the time.
>>
>>
>> First
>>
>>> they have to go through a long boring process which can take up to even
>>
>>
>> half
>>
>>> a year before they are approved when it's approved they wait about
>>
>>
>> another
>>
>>> half a year... by that time most people who initially wanted to work on
>>
>>
>> the
>>
>>> project decided not to anymore.
>>>
>>> If someone would have told us the whole blikketyblek is frozen, we
>>> would
>>> have had some kind of understanding. ISO codes aren't enoug: these
>>> wikis
>>> have been approved this means there have been serious discussions.
>>>
>>> I really hope a new wiki will be created this year though. (if
>>> possible)
>>>
>>> Serv
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2006/1/8, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>
>>>> On 1/7/06, Daniel Mayer
>>>> <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A much better policy needs to be created that takes this into
>>
>>
>> account.
>>
>>>> Preferably a much better and *retroactive* policy.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sam
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>>> Wikitech-l(a)wikimedia.org
>>>>
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>>>