-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Moin,
On Monday 31 October 2005 20:57, Christopher E. Granade wrote:
Uwe Brauer wrote:
The idea sounds appealing and I would support it,
however nothing has
been implemented so far, as I understand
Uwe
That seems like a really interesting proposal, though it also seems
like it would require a lot of work, and probably a seperation of
"old-style" and "Liquid" discussion pages, as old talk pages would
take
a hell of a lot of work to convert- work that seems hard to justify in
the long run. --Chris
OTOH, the currenty wikipages are not really suited to discussions at all -
I'd rather not have someone edit my "posts" - whether it be for fixing
the speling or whatever.
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail - but I think
a new disccusion support would be very good to have, even if it is a lot
of work. The longer the old sytle pages are the only possibility, hte
longer we will get more and more of them. :)
Best wishes,
Tels
- --
Signed on Tue Nov 1 00:01:40 2005 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at
http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on
http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three
persons, two of them absent." -- Unknown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQ2ajA3cLPEOTuEwVAQHcsQf/UrZl52R5q3GAtp8wm9JBeee42M7sjAts
KKy/89sj/33MzYUMZ46C8f8d+jIMngGJgoYLpMos5vnwvtIcFS+WcbzSXbxXNAJq
ry1rFZzmpYDeBLy3Gwe7IwZJiSOFGgIBmGHQyXabHUd8UOUk3SebFYO04h/RLQtC
xr+GffLsxv7Q4LJolBbhs5ZEojD9XfXHLjYDCRL1YLEiiqM3fSWEIWMJaR+1tqqD
TskQv/qPvJ64lvBSyBh+e7Na5tx2V7G9MKPSyv55eN+9P/TEy3f/GuM4z7TNr209
6PowIav0n8IW1fMCdisg9NMo3uQhsZZR8+tteXH/bUrPTXSkHQGIpg==
=Chk3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----