>>>> "Rowan" == Rowan Collins
>>>> <rowan.collins(a)gmail.com> writes:
Rowan> This has been discussed before (I haven't any links to hand,
Rowan> but the usual Googling with "site:mail.wikipedia.org" should
I did not find any of these, most likely my googling ability is poor.
Rowan> turn things up from these lists), but the central problem is
Rowan> that the current setup has no internal representation of a
Rowan> single thread, let alone a single comment, only of a whole
Rowan> page (roughly equivalent to a forum, or a mailbox). The
Rowan> individual threads could potentially be interpretted out by
Rowan> looking at headers, though these aren't used entirely
Rowan> consistently, but it would require quite complex and
Rowan> unreliable pattern matching to separate what humans can
Rowan> easily see as the individual comments.
Right, that is what I thought.
Rowan> Furthermore, this is in some ways an *advantage* - all the
Rowan> old-fashioned wiki processes, like refactoring and so on,
Rowan> can take place on the discussion page, unrestricted by
Rowan> structure imposed by the software. One intriguing compromise
Rowan> was the "LiquidThreads" proposal, at
Rowan>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LiquidThreads, but I'd
Rowan> consider it more of an "idea" than a "planned
feature"...
The idea sounds appealing and I would support it, however nothing has
been implemented so far, as I understand
Uwe