"Kate" <keturner(a)livejournal.com> wrote in message
news:6019986.1hDDKoznoz@rose.local...
in 1.5, we have the possibility of changing URLs used
for projects.
[examples snipped]
For the sake of lowering blood-pressure all around, should be assume that
these new formats are **in addition** to those currently in use?
I like them, but I echo the concerns of those worried about breaking inward
links.
Actually I like the possiblity of specifying links in more than one way to
allow maximal flexibility. If we **can** handle it, then we **should**
handle it. The principle of "least surprise" should come into pre-emptive
action here.
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]