Dori wrote:
On 4/21/05, Magnus Manske <magnus.manske(a)web.de>
wrote:
Can do. How about img_metadata, with XML? We could
add more EXIF data or
other metadata about the image there. Or would that be too slow to parse?
Might I suggest file_metadata, we don't want to get stuck with img for files
again. I could see how metadata for other files might be useful. Just have
one of the fields be the type of file.
The table is called "image", all field names in that table are prefixed
with img_, that's how it's been since phase3 was written. We're already
stuck with it, it's too late.
-- Tim Starling