Erik Moeller wrote:
Some feedback:
1) If there's just one article, it still gets a semicolon appended. I have
no opinion yet as to whether the list should be formatted as one big block
or as a list, though.
Fixed.
2) We don't seem to have parent/child categories
yet. If a category is
itself added to a category, the parent category should have a section
called
== Child categories ==
Done.
And the child category should have a section called
== Parent categories ==
Unnecessary. They're displayed as "normal" categories of this very page.
3) Similarly, it would be neat if the list of
categories would be
structured according to parent child relationships, i.e.
* Biology
** Medicine
* France
** French monarch
...
What about double entries? "Biochemistry" is both in category
"Biology"
and "Chemistry". Should that appear under both?
4) I think the categories should be put under the page
subtitle, or at the
bottom of the page, but definitely not next to "printable version".
Trying your first suggestion. Looks OK.
5) After I initially proposed the scheme, Brion
suggested that it would be
useful to have some way to specify how an article should be sorted in the
category list, e.g.
[[Category:Author|King, Stephen]]
*Way* too complicated without a separate database table (which, I won't
get tired of reminding you, was my initial implementation ;-)
I still worry
that we'll create a mess like we did with the interlanguage
links. But, here, you go anyway.
I'm worried about this if we don't have hierarchical categories.
Otherwise, I think we can avoid creating a too big mess by coming up with
a reasonable hierarchy.
Let's see how this works out...
Magnus