On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Marco Krohn wrote:
> I think they are compatible if they are separately
licensed.
O.k. but then we have to make this very clear that the
GFDL applies _not_ to
all the content we provide.
Isn't this already too late? You can only dual license copyleft material if all
copyright holders agree to it. The people who have posted stuff so far on
Wikipedia have posted it under GFDL exclusively.
If we want to combine different licenses, we have to track down all
contributers for each relevant article, and get their permisson. Otherwise,
we're breaking GFDL.
And the only way to combine copylefted material with restricted material is by
dual licensing (ours would be "GFDL for everyone, Fair Use for wikipedia.org").
(As I understand it.)
-- Daniel