--- Brion Vibber <vibber(a)aludra.usc.edu> wrote:
( ) This file is public domain (has fallen out of
copyright, was
never copyrighted, or has been explicitly put in PD by the
author)
( ) This file is licensed under GFDL
( ) Copyright owner gives permission to reproduce for
non-commercial/educational purposes only
NOTE: [concerns over distribution, prefer free files]
( ) This file is used under 'fair use' claims without permission of
the copyright holder. NOTE: [concerns over distribution, prefer
free files]
My concern is this: a rational copyright holder faced with these
choices will alway choose option 4 (permission for non-commercial
distribution), thereby retaining maximal control. Yet option 4 is the
one most detrimental to Wikipedia's goals, preventing modification as
well as publication in a commercial book/CDROM version.
Axel
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com