Evan wrote:
http://www.wikitravel.org/article/Wikitravel:Why_Wikitravel_isn%27t_GFDL
With the by-sa CC license, you have a copyright
notice and the URL of
the license. Baddabingbaddaboom.
We need a print-it-and-go-license; the GFDL is much
more oriented to
publishing bound books, where adding another 10
pages isn't really
that important.
I'm not sure I followed this part.
Well -- I kinda assumed that the GFDL was usable for
all your needs -- It doesnt make sense that the full
text of something GNU be reproduced -- It seems that
Before you ever print anything -- you need content,
and generally the go with what works-ness of the
GNUFDL would usually work. Perhaps if you went with
the FDL anyway (for starters), by the time you
actually had enough material where someone wants to
reproduce a flier from some of it, there will be some
resolution to the license reproduction issue.
-S-
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com