Lightning wrote:
Maybe it's time to drop inverse_timestamp? or do
we still need it for
something? Could this also help us squeeze a bit more perfomance?
It really wouldn't change performance at all I think, and removing it
would require reindexing the tables, thus taking the wiki down for many
hours.
We might do it at some point if we're changing the table structure
anyway, but no hurry.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)