On 17/10/06, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Although gmaxwell will eat me, yes. GFDL is _viral_
too. The bigger trick
of GFDL and which may make some parties to still pay for it is that you need
to include a copy of the GFDL (several pages). If it hasn't other license,
they
must contact you (and get an agreement) to use it without such terms.
Yes. For using images in print, the GFDL is pretty much a pretend free
content license, as the terms are ridiculously onerous in practice.
- d.