Rig? No. I just deleted votes that were invalid,
like Pavel did.
Really? Your rules were that every account made before
the vote is valid. Why did you delete my vote?
BTW, your attempt to justify this by changing the
rules of the vote *after* the vote ended was pitiful.
This can be checked, and I provided the link in my
initial post:
And the limited number is not currently 0. You have
not been following
this discussion for very long. Please take a look at
the archives. You
have accused me of arguing on topics I am not
familiar with, now you
are being a hypocrite.
Actually, I'm following this *very* closely.
Could you, please, tell me who these editors are?
And don't start with "I have said it before". This is
your favourite excuse. Just list some user names.
:en:Dpotop
Mark
On 30/06/06, Jacky PB <dpotop1(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hm, interesting, so you want another criterion to
measure the "genuine interest" in mo.wikipedia.
Then, I suggest some rules for this measurement:
1. Take into account only hits to actual articles
(main namespace) having more than 5 lines of
text.
Otherwise said, the articles copied from the
Romanian wikipedia.
2. Make the measurement on a period when there was
no full-scale revert war (for instance, before
the
current one started).
3. Do not count IPs of Romanian wikipedia users,
nor
IPs of Russian wikipedia users. These users
(like
me) are just inspecting mo.wikipedia to spot
the current status of the revert war (it's full
scale and never stops). One week ago, for
instance,
Mark (User:Node_ue) tried to organize, and
then
rig
some elections to get back his sysop status
(he
has
been desysopped some time ago for bad
behavior).
If you think you can do this, then ask yourself
what
this measures. Remember: you cannot assume that
the
traffic has the same structure here as in
en.wikipedia.
Yours,
Dpotop
--- mboverload <mboverload(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What I'm actually interested in is the number of
> hits on that wikipedia.
>
> mboverload
>
> On 6/30/06, Jacky PB <dpotop1(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > But you are not Moldovan. You are not able
to
> write Moldovan.
> > > You pretend helping some people that did not
ask
> for your help.
> > > No native Moldovan expressed an interest in
your
> wikipedia.
> >
> > I am Moldovan. It is your _opinion_ that I am
"not
> able to write
> > Moldovan", especially given that you attach no
> adverb. "Native
> > Moldovans" (assuming you mean Moldovans living
in
> Moldova) have
> > expressed an interest, although in very
limited
> numbers.
> > The "limited number" is currently 0. :)
> >
> > And anyone can check this by looking at the
number
> of users registered
> > (with Babel) as speakers of Moldovan (code
mo). On
> the whole wikipedia,
> > there is a single "mo" user, which is Mark,
a.k.a.
> User:Node_ue. And he's
> > level mo-2, meaning that he's making basic
grammar
> and spelling errors.
> >
> > :en:Dpotop
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new
> Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> >
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around