[Wikipedia-l] Moldovan wikipedia: hands waiving is not proof

Wed Jun 28 13:11:25 UTC 2006

Answer: NO!

The only registered user of Moldovan on the whole wikipedia is User:Node_ue (in en, mo, ro, etc.). And he's mo-2.

Dpotop

mboverload <mboverload at gmail.com> wrote: QUESTION:  I don't care if they're native, are there any "near native"
speakers of "MOLDOVAN" on en.wikipedia.org?

mboverload

On 6/28/06, Mark Williamson  wrote:
>
> And you're accusing me of spreading FUD? Psht.
>
> Mark
>
> On 28/06/06, Jacky PB  wrote:
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > After sending my point of view here, I presumed someone was going to
> investigate the matter, by asking questions and LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE
> FACTS. To my surprise, this did not happen (maybe every high-rank admin is
> in vacations?).
> >
> > As I noticed in my initial post of June 24th, the this lack of decision
> can only lead to the situation coarsing, and the various parts stacking all
> sorts of  oppinions. This is true for the Romanians and for the few
> Romanian-speaking Moldovans that support the deletion of this wikipedia.
> This is also true for Mark Williamson (User:Node_ue) and for the Russians
> that support him. There is no nativ Moldovan speaker supporting
> mo.wikipedia.
> >
> > Now, to come back to the facts. I suggest reading my post of June 24th,
> which is not, as Mark says, too high-level. It mainly notices three facts,
> that can easily be checked (despite all the hands-waving of Mark):
> >
> > 1.  THERE IS NO NATIVE MOLDOVAN SPEAKER HERE ON WIKIPEDIA.
> >
> > 2.  99% of the articles of mo.wikipedia have been copied from
> ro.wikipedia with just the script changed from Latin to Cyrillic, by Mark
> (Usedr:Node_ue).
> >
> > 3.  Mark assumes for himself a level mo-2, meaning that he is not able
> to write text in Moldovan.
> >
> > All the other users on mo.wikipedia are either against Mark (including
> some trolls), or create 1-line incorrect articles, or simply move around
> interwiki links to give the impression something happens.
> >
> > This means that there is NO COMMUNITY, and that mo.wikipedia is nothing
> more than a political statement without any other content. Is this the
> vocation of wikipedia?
> >
> > MY SUGGESTION: LOOK AT THE FACTS DIRECTLY on mo.wikipedia. Hands waiving
> and sending message after message with FUD is the strong point of Mark. But
> he cannot alter edit histories, nor user lists.
> >
> > Please, look at the facts yourself.
> >
> > Yours,
> > [[:en:User:Dpotop]], [[:ro:User:Dpotop]]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
> countries) for 2ï¿½/min or less.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
>
> --
> Refije dirije lanmï¿½ yo paske nou posede pwï¿½p bato.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.