[Wikipedia-l] Policy clarification: Undue weight (example)

Tue Apr 11 19:11:05 UTC 2006

For those that are interested, as an example of an article where I 
feel that significant material is being excluded on the grounds of 
undue weight (and other pretenses), I would point people to an 
article on "The Galaxy rotation problem".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_problem

A request for comments appears 
at  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Galaxy_rotation_problem (see 
the section RfC: The Galaxy rotation problem: Alternative theories).

I had already suggested text (see link in RfC introduction) that was 
subsequently removed. Verification can be found in the following 
subsection, Results.

This is typical of many articles where "alternative views" are being 
completely removed.

Regards,
Ian Tresman