I agree, but highlighting based on browser preferences is still a good idea.
Josh Gerdes
(en:User:JoshG)
Mark Williamson wrote:
I think the best idea is just to have the name of the
language.
Mark
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:37:34 +0100, Magnus Manske <magnus.manske(a)web.de> wrote:
>I have (again) hacked together a minimal demo of a multilanguage portal.
>This is not for its good looks but for the function it provides.
>
>To be amazed by it, dial
>
http://magnusmanske.de/wikipedia/portal.php
>
>The page is generated from two local files containing the text and the
>article numbers, respectively. Calling the script with
>
http://magnusmanske.de/wikipedia/portal.php?update
>will update the local files from online files, which are hardcoded into
>the script. The article number file, which would normally be generated
>automatically once a day, is at
>
http://magnusmanske.de/wikipedia/num.txt
>and the text, to be editable for all, is at
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/PortalText
>
>Based on these files, and on your browser settings, it will highlight
>what *might* be your favourite language(s). If you set multiple
>languages in your browser, it will highlight them all. If your browser
>sets different weights for these languages, they will appear in
>different shades of grey.
>
>Yes, there is no other layout whatsoever. Don't complain. Web designers
>to the rescue!
>
>Magnus
>
>P.S.: Script is in CVS HEAD; "portal.php" in maintenance
>_______________________________________________
>Wikipedia-l mailing list
>Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
>http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>