--- Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why not? Will it suddenly become 'uncool' to
be a Wikipedian once the
word enters public usage?
It's a question of trade mark protection. Kleenex is a trademark, but
now people often use it to refer to any facial tissue. Same thing for
Xerox (Can I make a xerox of that?), and several others I can't think
of at the moment. If we don't take steps to protect our trademark, then
we can lose it.
We are not a wikipedia. We are _the Wikipedia_.
I would love for the name Wikipedia to be on everyone's tongue. But
only as a brand name, _the_ Wikipedia, referring to one specific (set
of) on-line encyclopedia(s). Not as a generic term for any
encyclopedia-type on-line resource using wiki software.
If what Collins is doing does not jeopardize our trademark, great! But
we need to watch to make sure.
-Rich Holton (en.wikipedia:User:Rholton)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250