On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:28:31 -0700, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I, for one, believe we should merge simple: with en:,
but instead of
having two articles for each topic, we merge them completely so there
is just one en: instead of two.
Using simple: for Simple English is very Anglocentric, and on top of
that one could use a site like PopJisyo (
http://www.popjisyo.com/ )
to explain the more difficult words.
I don't think a lot of people will agree with me here and I don't
expect a merger will happen in the near future, but that's still my
opinion.
Anglocentric? How? English is a very commonly spoken language. Would
you appreciate a rename of the project? "Foreign English"?
A "merge" of en: and simple: wouldn't be a merge. Everything in
simple: would be discarded and en: would stay as it is.