Timwi wrote:
Brion Vibber wrote:
There was no mention of abuse of sysop
privileges. Any user *can*
blank and suppress others' work (which may well be crap, junk,
pseudoscience, biased tripe, etc). Without specific information,
there's nothing to be done or said.
I see.
Apogr & Ralesk, I suggest you supply "specific information".
(Although I think I might mention that I disagree with Brion; although
Apogr was a little vague in his original posting, he did give "specific
information" in the sense that what he described clearly constitutes
sysop privilege abuse.)
Well, let's look at what he said:
I wonder why Grin, who seems to be in charge of
editing/revising/censoring wikipedia in Hungarian,
It starts with an ad hominem attack ("censoring").
has been given the privilege and the courage to
disqualify any entries
that
It's not clear what "disqualify" means. All Wikipedians have wide
privileges to edit, refactor, remove, and rebuild, and should have the
courage to do so ("be bold in editing!")
a) are not direct translations of a similar entry in
the En Wiki
No examples are given with which we could attempt to verify the claim.
b) he is not familiar with, as he does not seem to be
knowledgeable in
everything, save GNU technology and practising paranoia.
No examples are given, and again an ad hominem attack.
It has happened twice already, and both me and a
friend of mine find
it insulting and revolting to doubt our competence that way,
It has happened "twice", but neither instance is described with
specificity, and the other wronged party remains unnamed. All we know is
that they feel insulted.
especially so, because both entries were offered in
the trial sections
(usertalk) for comment and were instead labelled as text of dubious
origin.
This makes it appear that articles were never actually put up, but
merely proposed in discussion. "Text of dubious origin" is not
clarified, but copyright/plagiarism suspicions are one reason one might
raise such an objection in a discussion.
Could you tell the s.o.b. that despite his memorable
contributions in
general, he is no GOD almighty disguised as peter gervai?
Closes with an ad hominem attack, without ever specifying the alleged
wrongdoing.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)