[Wikipedia-l] mirror of Dutch Wikipedia
Daniel Mayer
maveric149 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 10 11:24:26 UTC 2004
Evan Prodromou wrote:
>So, isn't the whole point of Wikipedia to create and distribute free
>information? I mean, yes, downstream publishers should -- no, *must*
>-- comply with the GFDL, but besides that, shouldn't we be _happy_
>that someone's redistributing the encyclopedia?
The GNU FDL has a strict author credit requirement. We make things /very/ easy
of downstream users by stating that a link-back to the particular article
copied fullfills this requirement. Given this, and since Wikipedia is a
collective work, it is not much to also ask for a mention of our project's
name.
>We need to make it _easier_ for people to re-publish the encyclopedia
>in a way that complies with the GFDL -- not punish them for doing so.
OK, how does that relate to what I said? I'm all for making it easy to use our
content. But I also think that we should be properly cited since we do not
ask that any /individuals/ get author credit. Again since Wikipedia articles
are collective works, I think that since individuals are not credited in
third party copies, that the project should.
Otherwise downstream users can state only '[This article] is licensed under
the [GNU Free Documentation License]' with [This article] being a link to the
Wikipedia article and [GNU Free Documentation License] being a link to the
GNU FDL (with no underlines under [This article] or [GNU Free Documentation
License] to indicate that those are hyperlinks).
I've seen this on at least one website and I don't like it - it does not give
readable credit to the collective work and is not a proper citation - it
gives the impression (just by reading the message) that the article was
written at that website and that that website somehow owns the copyright.
>That said, it's probably a good idea to ask for links back to
>xx.wikipedia.org. Not to promote the site (hell, it's plenty popular),
>but to make it easier for readers to contribute and fix errors in
>articles.
??? OK, what about the author requirement? The only alternative is for them to
list 5 authors of every article.
-- mav
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list