On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:54:55PM -0800, Daniel Mayer
wrote:
Jimbo wrote:
...
If that means less images for now, then it means less images
for now. It also means that we have a very strong incentive
to develop free alternatives.
No it means that many things will *never* have images. For example, Dolly the
Sheep is dead. The only images of her are either from the news media or from
the Roslin Institute. Therefore I used the images from the Roslin Institute.
The license on those images states that they can be freely used in a
noncommercial setting so long as credit is given. I have done that.
Fair use is one thing but this has gone way too far.
Image deleted.
And you lied when submitting that it is a free image.
You should at least feel ashamed of what you have done.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
And you should be ashamed by abusing sysop rights by deleting an image
without discussion. There is clearly no consensus to delete images we
have permission to use.
I don't understand why you think this is worse than fair use - this
image is used entirely legally, unlike a lot of "fair use" images. It
would also probably be illegal for a UK contributor to upload it under
American fair use law.
I notice that it was quickly restored, and messages left on your talk
page asking you to desist.
Caroline / Secretlondon