[Wikipedia-l] Logo consensus?

Thu Oct 9 09:13:22 UTC 2003

Sure, visual is better than text ;o)
What about cut the logo in parts to create "only globe color" variants,
"only globe text" variants and "only wikipedia text" variants. The final
logo will be assemblage of the favorite variant of each parts.

Aoineko

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Erik Moeller" <erik_moeller at gmx.de>
To: <wikipedia-l at wikipedia.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Logo consensus?

> Guillaume-
> > No objection on Nohat's variant.
> > But perhaps we can vote again :o) not for logo, but just for feature on
the
> > logo.
> > For exemple :
> > Color : Yes / B&W
> > Texte on the globe : No / Big / Small
> > Wikipedia : No / Upper / Lower
> > Or something like that.
> > Just a idea... but perhaps people against this logo will still against
it...
>
> I prefer voting/expressing my opinion on actual variants. For example, I
> might prefer a color variant of Nohat's logo, but I do not like the
> current color variants much (too pale). I might want *some* kind of text,
> but then someone might create a totally cluttered variant and I would hate
> it. So I'd say we should just encourage people to keep submitting variants
> in all colors, shapes and sizes and then express our opinion on what we
> think about those particular variants.
>
> Regards,
>
> Erik
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>