I am sympathetic to this, but I think that there needs to be a fairly
tight policy. As an example, we really can't take a photo from
Reuters and claim fair use -- our use is too similar to theirs,
competes with theirs, etc.
I think it's worth discussing at length so we can get our heads clear
about what the exact bounds should be. Commons-only is very safe for
now, but your point is valid of course.
David Speakman wrote:
C&P from the Wikinews watercooler:
I officially propose that we institute an "Image:" upload capability
into the Wikinews area and drop the use of Wiki Commons as our default
image upload site and article image server since it will harm the depth
of our news coverage. The use of Wiki Commons as our image source will
hamper us since [[w:fair use]] images are not allowed there. It is my
belief that news sometimes needs fair use graphics -- case in point: the
"Wells Fargo and Barclay's rumoured to be in merger talks" article in
which I inserted a Wells Fargo and Barclays logo - which visually helps
the story. But since we use Wiki Commons for our image source, this
graphic will most likely be deleted, leaving the story text-only. --
Davodd | Talk 10:13, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
--
David Speakman
http://www.DavidSpeakman.com
501 Moorpark Way #83
Mountain View CA 94041
_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
--
"Pianosa is een Italie" - first words of 50,000th article on
nl.wikipedia.org