On Sep 17, 2006, at 12:15 AM, geni wrote:
A popular vote of of scientists would not be the
worst description of
what goes on. Although of course the actual process is ar more
complex.
I just see a massive amount of wishful thinking and naivete in the
proposals @
citizendium.org and mailing list... As if expert editors
do not have POVs to push, or that politics will not enter such a
system, or that expert editors with Phd's will be any better at text-
based social interactions and collaborative editing than mere mortals.