On 19/09/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If he continues to use them we have an admin acting
not as a janitor
but as part of the executive. Users have can have no real idea how he
well use those powers. Thus he will be disruptive. He's already
deleted a load of stuff without giving a reason we could probably do
without that happening again.
What load of stuff was this? With full references, you're making an
accusation here that you consider serious enough to warrant
desysopping - don't just say "I alluded to it in passing somewhere up
there."
Process has a tendency to exist for a reason.
Yes, usually an ad-hoc one. That it hangs around well past then and is
applied in situations it shouldn't be is a problem with that process
and with process in general.
If an admin is not
prepared to find out what that reason is then they should not be
ignoring the process because they are very likely to make mistakes.
Wikipedia is not anarchy. and admin who isn't going to bother with
process is out of control of pretty much everyone. An admin who is out
of control is a problem.
Whose control are you or I in?
- d.