[WikiEN-l] [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] are destroying Wikipedia

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] are destroying Wikipedia
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] are destroying Wikipedia
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com wrote:

>Ray Saintonge wrote
>  
>
>>Claims about whether Wikipedia is reliable or unreliable are most often 
>>speculative. 
>>    
>>
>Wikipedia is unreliable. You can't settle a bet with Wikipedia. If you actually needed to buy Britannica in the past, you still do. The wriggle-room between 'unreliable' and 'useless' turns out to be so large we have shoehorned a multimillion-article reference site in there.
>
So then, what is the most reliable way of measuring reliability?

Ec

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] are destroying Wikipedia
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]] are destroying Wikipedia
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]