On 9/19/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.com> wrote:
Ben McIlwain stated for the record:
[[User:Unforgettableid]] wrote:
>On 9/18/06, Forbidden Places
<postmaster(a)forbidden-places.be> wrote:
>
>>Hi Jason,
>>No problem, as long as the videos are not edited.
>
>We will not edit the video. Other people will be able to edit the
>video in the future once it is posted on Wikipedia, but we at
>Wikipedia have no plans to. It would be nice if you remove the ad for
>your website in the corner of your video though... :-)
Who are you to say that we won't edit the video? Maybe you won't, but
maybe someone else will, in a way that makes it more useful, and then
link that on Wikipedia. That's the point of viral licensing and
ShareAlikes. I'm afraid "you're not allowed to edit it" is a
deal-breaker.
Emphatic agreement with Ben. The video ''will'' be edited -- I
personally guarantee it. Please ensure that Forbidden Places
<postmaster(a)forbidden-places.be> knows that I have said so, and that you
have no authority to revoke parts of the GFDL.
Hi Sylvain,
I was incorrect about editing. The video will be edited.
I believe that if the video is edited, the person doing the editing
must label it as a "derivative work" of your video and provide full
credit when they publish the edited work. I do not know the full set
of rules for the licenses; those are available at
www.creativecommons.org for the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike License and
www.gnu.org for the GNU Free
Documentation License.
Is this a problem?
Cheers,
Jason