Hi again,
Yeah I know Creative Commons pretty well, my brother is in the music field.
It is not possible for the moment, but I would agree on the principle.
Why not? Well the videos use commercial music currently. I am in the process
of re-doing them with a friend of mine doing electronic music. Anyway, I
find these videos crappy now, needed to re-edit them again.
Do you have an urgent needs for these videos?
Cheers!
S.
--
Photos, videos and urban exploration!
www.forbidden-places.be
Photos, vidéos & exploration urbaine!
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [[User:Unforgettableid]] [mailto:unforgettableid@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 19 septembre 2006 14:53
À : Sylvain
Cc : Sean Barrett; English Wikipedia
Objet : Re: [WikiEN-l] Would you like one of your videos posted on
Wikipedia?
On 9/19/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.com> wrote:
Ben McIlwain stated for the record:
> [[User:Unforgettableid]] wrote:
>>>On 9/18/06, Forbidden Places <postmaster(a)forbidden-places.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Jason,
>>>>No problem, as long as the videos are not edited.
>>>
>>>We will not edit the video. Other people will be able to edit the
>>>video in the future once it is posted on Wikipedia, but we at
>>>Wikipedia have no plans to. It would be nice if you remove the ad for
>>>your website in the corner of your video though... :-)
>
> Who are you to say that we won't edit the video? Maybe you won't, but
> maybe someone else will, in a way that makes it more useful, and then
> link that on Wikipedia. That's the point of viral licensing and
> ShareAlikes. I'm afraid "you're not allowed to edit it" is a
deal-breaker.
Emphatic agreement with Ben. The video ''will'' be edited -- I
personally guarantee it. Please ensure that Forbidden Places
<postmaster(a)forbidden-places.be> knows that I have said so, and that you
have no authority to revoke parts of the GFDL.
Hi Sylvain,
I was incorrect about editing. The video will be edited.
I believe that if the video is edited, the person doing the editing
must label it as a "derivative work" of your video and provide full
credit when they publish the edited work. I do not know the full set
of rules for the licenses; those are available at
www.creativecommons.org for the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike License and
www.gnu.org for the GNU Free
Documentation License.
Is this a problem?
Cheers,
Jason