[WikiEN-l] Citizendium

Mon Sep 18 15:54:31 UTC 2006

Kim van der Linde wrote

> To be honest, if (BIG IF) Citizendium is going to work and produces 
> higher quality stuff at a sufficient fast rate, it will only need a 
> study or two showing that Citizendium is higher quality/more reliable 
> than Wikipedia to flip everything around. If Wikipedia has to rely on 
> Citizendium for better quality GFDL texts than that they can produce 
> themselves, it effectively proves that Wikipedia cannot do what it wants 
> with its current editing paradigm.

Frankly, I doubt it proves that. Everyone who argues solely in terms of 'star' content and ignores the infrastructural things makes a big if typical mistake. It is going to be a lot easier for WP to improve article content, in areas where it actually has some welcome competition, than it is going to be for those rivals to import into their site the necessary redirects and so on, to give the navigational smooth ride. (I think scholars out there are aware that in general Europeans before 1500 have far too many names; I know which site I put my money on to have the variants.)

Charles

-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information