On 12/09/06, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/12/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Wikipedia is not popual due to it's FAs and
GAs. It's popular becuase
> of it's good enough articles.
True. But being respectable is not really the same
thing as being
popular; and I was under the impression that the former was a more
practical concern for us than the latter.
Fairly obviously, our real popularity comes from the social networking
possibilities of our userboxes.
Oh sorry, they were last year's thing. What's this year's? I forget.
- d.