On 9/10/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/09/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) <alphasigmax(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, and thanks to people claiming the "DRV
doesn't have a snowball's
chance in hell of being deleted" (despite the fact that several people
were strongly in favour), I've now created the proposed policy of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_Undeletion for your
perusal.
Well, it arguably didn't, regrettable as that is.
Possible workable split: DRV for strict process review; AFU for merit
undeletion.
Perhaps keep DRV as a general over-arching policy and add "Process Review
of
Deletion" (or something similar) for process appeals and Articles for
Undeletion for content appeals. Basically, disambiguate the usage and
intent.
Carl