Guettarda wrote:
Actually one of the major issues in the dispute is
whether BC/AD violates
NPOV because it requires Wikipedia to make an assertion the Jesus is the
Messiah/God. BCE/CE merely describes the condition, and thus does what the
NPOV policy asks.
That's a disingenuous presentation of the problem. Can you show a
single instance where your assertion that Jesus is Messiah/God is
required, and that is not a part of someone's argument against BC/AD?
The use of BC/AD merely requires that there may have been an historical
Jesus who was born at or near a time that is reasonably consistent with
the dating system. The idiotic assertion that Jesus was God is irrelevant.
Ec