Stephen Bain wrote:
We could have a paragraph in Craig's article
describing the
controversy, including how the Spokesman-Review ran the story and the
mainstream commentary on the whole business. But would that be
appropriate from a BLP perspective? The real story is only
peripherally about Craig.
If someone encounters the rumors about Craig and is curious about them,
I expect the first place they'll look is the page about Craig. So if
this rumor really is very popular and widespread IMO it's quite
reasonable to at least mention it on Craig's page, ideally providing a
link to another article where details about the "real story" can be
found (probably [[The Spokesman-Review]], I would guess).
Disclaimer, this opinion is based entirely on your description of the
situation.