On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:48:14 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
You would need
to ask Silas why he originally made that comparison.
But you were the one who took that comparison and said
I think the answer to this question is to check
the availability of
recorded media celebrating skilled operators of the pipe organ versus
the fleshlight. Organists are notable, wankers are not.
You were using the pipe organ article's "justification for existence" to
evaluate sex toys, which is in itself silly regardless of who originally
brought pipe organs up.
No, I was pointing out why the comparison is invalid. You appear to
be asserting that my pointing out that the comparison was invalid, was
invalid. I disagree.
Guy (JzG)
--