On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:02:33 -0400, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org>
wrote:
Nobody is claiming it's of transcendent global
importance, merely that
it's important enough to merit a mention, either in an article by itself
or in passing in a larger article about male-targetted sex toys (I favor
the latter, unless more verifiable material turns up).
I don't have any problem with a merge either. I *do* have a problem
with the massive over-reaction to the deletion of this one product of
strictly limited significance.
Maybe if I wasn't married I would view it as more important.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG