On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:23:53 -0400, Phil Sandifer
<Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The second is using reliability as the latest code for
notability, In
this case, a standard for notability that is flagrantly different
from the practical standard used in articles is used as a cover for
deleting articles, often being used to ignore the numeric consensus
on AfDs because [[WP:RS]] is cited in [[WP:V]], essentially giving it
a pseudo-policy status, despite its deep flaws. What is particularly
dangerous here is that it tends to be done unilaterally, and then
supported on DRV, which has, as has been previously noted, been
overrun by lunacy.
In other words, someone deleted an article you like on a subject from
teh internets.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG